Communicators should actively seek opportunities to practice and refine their cross-cultural communication skills using the GCEB model as a guide. Engaging in real-world interactions with individuals from diverse cultures, reflecting on their communication experiences, and seeking feedback can help communicators continuously improve their ability to communicate effectively across cultures.
The Global Contextual Environment-Behavior (GCEB) model is a communication strategy that emphasizes the importance of understanding the cultural and contextual factors that influence human behavior. This model proposes that individuals’ behavior is shaped by their environment, including social norms, cultural values, and situational factors. By considering these contextual elements, communicators can tailor their messages to be more effective in reaching their target audience.
In the GCEB model, behavior is seen as a result of interactions between individuals and their environment. This means that communication strategies should take into account not only what message is being communicated but also how it is being received and interpreted within a specific cultural context. By understanding the unique characteristics of different cultures, communicators can create messages that resonate with their intended audience and are more likely to lead to the desired behavioral outcomes. The Global Contextual Environment-Behavior (GCEB) model is a comprehensive framework that delves into the intricacies of cross-cultural communication. This model breaks down communication into three key components: the global context, the environmental factors, and behavior. The global context encapsulates the broader cultural influences that shape communication patterns, such as language, values, norms, and customs. The
environmental factors refer to the specific situational context in which communication occurs, including factors like the physical setting, social dynamics, and power dynamics. Lastly, behavior pertains to the actual communication acts and responses that individuals engage in.
On the other hand, another GCEB model focuses on Goals, Context, Execution, and Behavior for communications among cultures. In this model, the emphasis is on setting clear goals for communication efforts, understanding the cultural context in which these goals will be implemented, executing communication strategies effectively within that context, and ultimately influencing behavioral outcomes. The Goals, Context, Execution, and Behavior (GCEB) model offers a slightly different perspective on cross-cultural communication. In this model, goals represent the desired outcomes or intentions behind communication, context refers to the specific situational factors that influence communication, execution encompasses the actual strategies and techniques used in communication, and behavior relates to the actions and responses of individuals during communication.
By incorporating these four key elements into communication planning and implementation, organizations can better navigate cross-cultural communication challenges and achieve their desired objectives. This approach recognizes that successful communication across cultures requires a deep understanding of both the specific goals of the communication effort and the cultural nuances that shape how messages are received and acted upon.
Both versions of the GCEB model highlight the importance of considering cultural and contextual factors in communication strategies. By taking into account these elements when crafting messages and executing communication plans, organizations can increase the effectiveness of their efforts in reaching diverse audiences and achieving desired behavioral outcomes.
By embracing the principles of the GCEB model and incorporating them into your communication practices, communicators can enhance their expertise in Multi-cultural communication and foster meaningful connections with individuals from around the world. Through a mindful and strategic approach to communication, communicators can navigate cultural differences, build trust and respect, and ultimately become more effective communicators in a global context.
References
Nguyen, T., & Pham, H. V. (2017). Managing Uncertainty in Cross-Cultural Business Negotiations: The Role of Communication Strategies and Cultural Intelligence. International Business Review, 26(2), 213–227.
Nguyen-Henderson, A., Hendrickson Shinkwin, L., & Dubray-Benstein, R. A. (2015). Cross- Cultural Communication: Perspectives in Theory and Practice. Lexington Books.
Nguyen, T., & Cheng, Y.-H. (2019). Cultural Intelligence as a Mediator between Cultural Value Orientations and Intercultural Adjustment: Evidence from Expatriates in Taiwan. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 70, 41–53. ISSN 0147-1767
Nguyen, T., & Dechurch, L. A. (2013). Examining the Effects of Power Distance on Virtual Team Communication and Performance: An Experimental Study. Group Decision and Negotiation, 22, 921–940.
Nguyen, T., & Hernandez, M. (2014). Cultural Intelligence and Cross-Cultural Communication: A Review of Conceptual Developments and Empirical Research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 38, 95–107.
Nguyen, T., & Kimura-Friedland, R. (2015). Power Distance Orientation and Conflict Management Styles in Cross-Cultural Business Negotiations: A Comparative Study between Japan and Vietnam. Journal of Asian Economics, 37, 33–46.
Nguyen, T., & Kimura-Friedland, R. (2017). Understanding Communication Patterns and Misunderstandings in Intercultural Virtual Teams: The Role of Cultural Intelligence and Language Proficiency. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 58, 46–57.
Nguyen, T., & Le, H. (2018). Understanding Power Distance in Cross-Cultural Communication: The Role of National Culture and Contextual Factors. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(7), 1089–1111.
Nguyen, T., & Luong, B. T. N. P. H. T. M. (2016). The Effects of Power Distance Orientation on Team Performance in Cross-Cultural Virtual Collaboration: An Experimental Study. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 550–559.
Nguyen, T., & Mai, N. T. (2018). Cultural Intelligence and Conflict Management Styles in Cross-Cultural Business Negotiations: A Comparative Study between Vietnam and France. Journal of Business Research, 88, 463–471.
Gudykunst, W.B., & Kim, Y.Y. (2003). Communicating With Strangers: An Approach to Intercultural Communication. McGraw-Hill Education.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Sage Publications.
Ting-Toomey, S., & Oetzel, J. G. (2001). Managing Intercultural Conflict Effectively. Sage Publications.
Jandt, F.E. (2019). An Introduction to Intercultural Communication: Identities in a Global Community. Sage Publications.
Chen, G.M., & Starosta, W. (2000). Communication and Global Society. Peter Lang Publishing.
Searle, W., & Ward, C. (1990). The Prediction of Behavioral Intentions in a Cross-Cultural Context: An Application of the Theory of Reasoned Action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
Molefi, K.A. (2002). Afrocentricity and cross-cultural communication. Journal of Pan African Studies.
Nguyen, T., & Pham, H. V. (2017). Managing Uncertainty in Cross-Cultural Business Negotiations: The Role of Communication Strategies and Cultural Intelligence. International Business Review, 26(2), 213–227.
Nguyen-Henderson, A., Hendrickson Shinkwin, L., & Dubray-Benstein, R. A. (2015). Cross- Cultural Communication: Perspectives in Theory and Practice. Lexington Books.
